Home

Home

Profile

Profile

Activities

Activities

Contact

Contact

 
 
 

• Facts Speak For Thenselves
• Introduction
• Failure Of Governing Glass
• Data Collection
• Objectivity In Observation And Analysis
• Fifty Eight Pilgrims Roasted Alive
• Staff Of Railway Station Godhra
• Passengers Travelling In Sabarmati Express
• Witness To Later Part Of Incident
• Facts That Need Verifications
• Administrative Response
• Camps
• Role Of Media
• Conclusions
• Recommendations Alternate Plan Of
  Thought And Action

FACTS THAT NEED VERIFICATION

1.                  There was a conspiracy to reduce the effectiveness of the fire fighting system of Godhra municipal committee.

2.                  The mob that burnt the coach had Muslims from outside the town as well.

3.                  Firearms were used by the mob.

4.                  Police could have caught or killed some of the miscreants at the spot.

5.                  Local politicians and elected representatives took active part in instigating the mob.

6.                  Railway Police at Dahod sent a message to Godhra Railway police that some Muslim youths on board Sabarmati Express are likely to create mischief at Godhra.

7.                  Head of a passenger of S-6 coach was cut when he tried to get out of the window. The head was later thrown back into the coach to burn.

INFORMATION THAT APPEARS TO BE UNTRUE

1.                  Some female passengers are missing.

2.                  Some female passengers were raped or molested.

3.                  Passengers had pulled the beard of a vendor at Godhra Railway Station.

4.                  Passengers carried weapons with them.

5.                  Railway staff connived with the miscreants.

6.                  The pilgrims had taunted certain Muslims of Godhra while returning from Ayodhya.

7.                                          Police firing while they were burning the coach killed two Muslims.

SOME MYSTERIES

1.                  Assistant Collector, Godhra (a young Muslim from eastern UP) goes on leave two days before the incident and does not return till the middle of the March while the district of his posting was aflame with communal riots.

2.                  The unusual growth rate of Muslim population in Godhra.

3.                  Absence of information with the District officials about the number of arms licenses issued.

4.                  Abnormally large number of passports issued to the residents of Godhra.

5.                  Presence of a very large number of persons without ration cards in Signal Faliya and Polan Bazar areas of Godhra.

6.                  A large number of unemployed Muslims in Godhra have mobile phones.

7.                  Very high traffic of telephone calls from Godhra to Pakistan (mainly Karachi) before 27.02.02.

8. Holding of ‘istema’ - religious gatherings - at Godhra that were attended by foreigners in large numbers.

 

COMMUNAL RIOTS IN GUJARAT AFTER 27.02.02

BOTH SPONTANEOUS AND PLANNED BUT A TRAP OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM

The news of the events of 27.02.02 at Godhra at about 0800 hrs spread like a wild fire all over the country by the afternoon. The television media, which has the advantage of instantaneous reporting, played its role in disseminating the information about this carnage. Nothing happened for almost twenty-four hours, though the situation must have been very tense. Vishwa Hindu Parishad gave a call for statewide bandh against Godhra carnage. Communal violence erupted almost simultaneously on 28.02.02 in many parts of the state when the dead bodies and the injured and the passengers travelling in the ill-fated train reached their homes. It became more intense during next twenty-four hours and started subsiding after that. After 01.03.02 stray incidents were reported from various parts of the state on a daily basis.

On 15.03.02, after shila daan ceremony at Ayodhya by Ramchandra Paramhans processions of Ram dhun were taken out all over Gujarat. The participation on these occasions was very large in Gujarat, presumably as a reaction of what had happened in Godhra. The Ram dhun processions at many places including Ahemdabad and Vadodra became the points of communal tensions once again and the communal tension that was subsiding again flared up. Although the Muslim elders had assured the police at Vadodra that peace would be maintained at all costs, the processions were stoned from a mosque. The intensity of the attack proves that these were pre-meditated. The attack was so massive that the police had a tough time handling it. The state once again came under the grip of communal riots. The rioting was very intense for about three days. Sectarian violence, however, continued in several parts of the state.

Incidents of violence on a large scale were initially reported from Ahmedabad, Vadodara towns and the districts of Panchmahals, Sabarkantha and Mehsana. Later it spread to other areas also. However the communal violence was mainly confined to Central and North Gujarat. Saurashtra and South Gujarat remained relatively peaceful. There was no communal violence in one half of Gujarat. The team was told that when the charred bodies of the dead reached their families or the news of their killings reached the relatives, friends and neighbors attacked the nearby Muslim establishments. Similar incidents took place when chautha and kriya ceremonies of the dead were solemnised.

Gujarat has a long history of communal riots. The first such riot has been reported in 1714. After independence major riots broke out on several occasions since 1969. Jagmohan Reddy Commission of Inquiry. 1969 and Dave Commission of Inquiry 1985 have analysed the process and events of communal tensions in great detail. Serious rioting occurred in 1970 and also in 1992-93. According to official data between 1970 and 2002 Gujarat has witnessed 443 major communal incidents. Another character of the communal frenzy in Gujarat is that it has always taken a long time to return to near normalcy. For instance in Godhra itself in 1985 curfew remained imposed for about a year. Communal disturbance in 1985 continued for more than five months from Feb. to July 1985.

The Study team has not gone into the facts and figures of the number of persons killed, injured and displaced, the extent of the property damaged and the number of cases of female molestation, if any. It is not because these facts are not important but because the team lacked the time and resources to go into these details. However the Study Team has analysed the situation for:

1.                  Administrative response

2.                  Deployment of Army

3.                  Relief and resettlement measures

4.                  Confidence building measures

5.                  Socio-economic profile of the rioting mobs

6.                  Involvement of vanvasis

7.                  Role of media

 
 

Email This Page

  Print This Page