|
19. Godhra : A Strategic Appraisal,Lt. Gen. R. Narasimhan,
The Hindu, 2
April, 2002
By relegating the
Godhra issue to the back burner and concentrating on the aftermath of
the incident we as a nation have done a great disservice to the country.
In the hour of crisis the nation as a whole should rise and support the
government in tackling the crisis and not fall into the trap set by our
enemies.
THE Sabarmati Express
coming from Ayodhya side towards Ahmedabad was torched by a mob and
innocent unarmed people including women and children died a macabre
death. It will be interesting to note that all victims were Hindus. The
pilgrims (call them Ramsevaks) were returning after offering prayers at
Ayodhya much as most of us visit Tirupati or other shrines or the
Muslims who carry out a pilgrimage to Mecca. They were not involved in
karsevak activities. The incident was not a result of altercations
between tea vendors at the station and the pilgrims but a premeditated
and carefully planned operation to create communal disharmony in India
and erode the advantageous position
India
has attained post-Taliban operations in
Afghanistan.
Furthermore the
timing of the massacre was carefully planned to coincide with the
tension building up due to the VHP agitation for the construction of the
temple in Ayodhya. I do not propose going into the pros and cons of the
Ayodhya issue. What we need to examine is why the incident at Godhra
occurred triggering off large scale communal riots in
Gujarat. Fortunately by the timely induction of the Army the
violence was contained to the State. The timely pre-emptive measures
taken by various State Governments in the neighbourhood also prevented a
holocaust as planned and visualised by the planners of the Godhra
incident.
‘Why’ of the
incident
The Gujarat violence
and the Ayodhya developments diverted the attention of the press, both
domestic and international, as well of the so-called secularists
resulting in the macabre events at Godhra being given a go-by. The
Godhra incident is the core issue which needs examination in the
interests of national security. The mindless violence in Gujarat after
the event has to be condemned and the guilty punished. Unfortunately our
attention has been diverted from the ‘why’ of the Godhra incident by
events which followed after - in this we seem to have fallen into the
trap set by our enemies who had triggered off this incident. Was
communal disharmony the cause or was it an external agency? Let us
examine these in details.
After the shootout at
the Parliament House, India carried out a rapid and massive mobilisation
of its Armed Forces unprecedented since 1971. Indeed the speed with
which the mobilisation was carried out surprised the Pakistani
establishment as well as the U.S. Minor accidents due to faulty standard
operating procedures (SOPs) at the junior level did occur and were blown
out of proportion by the media. The strategic ratio of the Armed Forces
of Pakistan and
India
have been well documented and need not be elaborated upon. At this point
of time, Pakistan under pressure from the U.S. had to deploy regular
forces up to a division or more to seal the borders with Afghanistan.
They were also beset with internal security problems due to the forced
crackdown on Islamic jehad groups again at the insistence of the U.S.
In this scenario, the
Pakistani military leadership was on a sticky wicket, the nuclear option
though being bandied about, being a dubious course of action. Terrorist
activities in J & K and other parts of India again could not be carried
out due to the anti-terrorist mantra being propounded by the U.S. as
well as the improving relationship of the U.S. and India in economic,
military and other spheres of activity. In this scenario Pakistan had to
resort to other measures to make the Indian Army reel back to carry out
internal security operations which in fact is their secondary role. The
pulling out of army formations from their defensive and offensive
postures would degrade the strike potential of the Indian Armed Forces.
Indeed Pakistan succeeded to a certain extent with the Indian Army
having to pull out about a division for internal security duties when
they were poised for operations against Pakistan. It goes to the credit
of the planners at Army HQ that the defense potential was not degraded
and at the same time they provided adequate forces to contain the
violence. Under the circumstances the response was commendable.
Wrong projections
Some of the media and
their Bryl Cream boys were harping on the delay in deploying the Army in
Gujarat. They seem to have conveniently forgotten that the Army only two
months earlier had carried out a spectacular mobilisation which added
clout to the diplomatic efforts of the government to pressure
Pakistan
to desist from terrorism. Unfortunately we do not have trained war
correspondents who can analyse the strategic scenario and come to the
right conclusions. In this day of instant TV wrong projections are made
much to the detriment of the security of the country and morale of the
Armed Forces who are doing their duties in an exemplary manner.
By projecting their
immature and unconsidered views on TV they are jeopardising the security
of the nation. Some of the TV channels, whatever the modus operandi be,
are there to find loopholes in all things being done by the government.
They are free to criticise the government on its policies but should be
more circumspect in dealing with national security and particularly
operations of the Armed Forces. Small incidents concerning the Armed
Forces are blown out of proportion and people made to believe that rot
has set in at every level. It is time that the media did some
introspection and resorted to mature reporting. In their endeavour to
highlight the failings of the Gujarat Government, they went off at a
tangent and wholly ignored the trigger of the whole issue - Godhra and
the people who perpetuated it. In this our politicians are also guilty
in fishing in troubled waters when the country’s security was being
threatened. It took one lone woman Chief Minster from Tamil Nadu to
bring out the right perspective of condemning the Godhra incident.
Politicians need to forget their vote banks and internal squabbles when
they deal with national security.
American example
At this stage the
reactions of the Americans to the September 11 disaster need examination
and comparison with our home made political establishment. In September,
the U.S.
had a President who had at best been declared elected on technical
grounds due to electoral anomalies. His personality did not inspire
confidence within the country or in the international arena. The
September 11 attacks on the WTC was an intelligence failure of gigantic
proportions given the sophistication of surveillance devices the U.S.
possesses as well as their extensive intelligence networks comprising
the CIA and the FBI. The rescue efforts in New York of course went off
well due to citizen’s participation as well as the government agencies.
At this hour of grief and catastrophe, the U.S. people and Congress
reacted by fully backing their President forgetting all their
differences and their reservations on the President. This backing
resulted in the President taking firm and forceful decisions without
looking over his shoulders. Compare this with the Gujarat episode or for
that matter with various disaster situations which our country has had
to face from time to time. In our country, unfortunately politicians and
others see a disaster situation as a good opportunity to grab loaves
instead of assisting the government of the day to tackle the situation.
In a crisis situation, the Prime Minister, his Cabinet and the whole
government machinery should be able to concentrate on resolving the
crisis rather than looking over their shoulders at squabbling
politicians who want to exploit the situation for their personal gains
and vote banks. It is time that the politicians placed national security
and pride above their narrow ambitions. We have an elected government
which is answerable to Parliament. Once the dust settles down and the
crisis is resolved there is plenty of opportunity in our democratic
set-up to bring the government to book in Parliament. Of course to do
this the politicians who get elected need to educate themselves on
national security and its nuances to participate in a meaningful debate
- a far cry at this stage.
I am of the firm view
that by relegating the Godhra issue to the back burner and concentrating
on the aftermath of the incident we as a nation have done a great
disservice to the country. In the hour of crisis the nation as a whole
should rise and support their government in tackling the crisis and not
fall into the trap set by our enemies. In the last few weeks I am
convinced we have done just that and Musharraf and his staff must be
enjoying the fun. Our free press was so impressed by the General’s
flamboyance and arrogance at Agra and did not dare to question him on
contentious issues. Yet, when our own Chief of Army Staff, Gen.
Padmanabhan, did us proud by giving an erudite briefing, they were
trying to snipe at him. Our Army Chief has done us proud by his cool
handling of the situation and I am confident that if there is a war we
are going to win it. It is indeed a happy coincidence that we have a
team of battle-hardened professionals heading the three services at this
stage. Let us do some introspection as Indians and let us place our
nation first and our own personal amibitions in a secondary place. Any
amount of economic progress and agricultural production is not going to
make us stand proudly as a nation unless we believe in the concept of
nationhood and be proud of being Indians. |